Micron Document
🎖️GitЯра🎖️


Displaying Rendered • View rawDownload

specs/006-kmp-project-structure/checklists/requirements.md 988db081b289cbc23d9bceef8e7d85ab46d0e6a4 (988db081) Text, 1.74 KB

Specification Quality Checklist: KMP Recommended Project Structure Alignment

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2025-07-15 (updated with blog post context)
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
• [x] Focused on user value and business needs
• [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
• [x] All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

• [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• [x] Success criteria are measurable
• [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
• [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
• [x] Edge cases are identified
• [x] Scope is clearly bounded
• [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

• [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
• [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
• [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
• [x] No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

• The Architecture section references specific plugin names, DSL block names, and file paths because this is a build infrastructure feature — these are the "domain concepts" of the feature, not implementation details. The spec remains technology-agnostic regarding how the migration is executed.
• The "Design Standards Compliance" section was intentionally removed as this feature has zero UI impact.
• Gap analysis is based on a concrete audit of all 30+ modules — findings are documented in the Architecture section.
• All checklist items pass. Spec is ready for T383838/speckit.clarify or T383838/speckit.plan.

Served by rngit 1.5.0 - Generated in 0.05s